Page 1 of 1

VERY BAD: Iraq is last in child survival rankings

Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 1:36 am
by jaishalmujahideen
VERY BAD: Iraq is last in child survival rankings

By MARIA CHENG, AP Medical Writer
13 minutes ago


LONDON - The chance that an Iraqi child will live beyond age 5 has plummeted faster than anywhere else in the world since 1990, according to a report released Tuesday, which placed the country last in its child survival rankings

One in eight Iraqi children died of disease or violence before reaching their fifth birthday in 2005, according to the report by Save the Children, which said Iraq ranked last because it had made the least progress toward improving child survival rates.

Iraq's mortality rate has soared by 150 percent since 1990. Even before the latest war, Iraq was plagued by electricity shortages, a lack of clean water and too few hospitals.

The publication, which used data from 1990-2005, also determined that gains in survival rates in some of the world's poorest countries — including Botswana, Zimbabwe and Swaziland — were declining.

The vast majority of child deaths — more than nine in 10 — occur in just 60 developing countries, the report said. Of the approximately 10 million children under age 5 who die every year, most could be saved with cheap solutions, like nets to protect against mosquito-borne malaria or antibiotics to treat pneumonia, according to the report.

"These aren't intractable problems," Dr. William Foege, of the Emory University School of Public Health, wrote in a foreword to the report. "It is simply wrong for only the few to have access to all of the tools for survival because of where they live."

About 4 million children die of complications in the first month after birth every year, according to Save the Children. Other causes of death for young children include diarrhea, pneumonia and measles, the group reported.

Among industrialized countries, Iceland had the best child survival rate, and Romania the worst. The U.S. placed 26th, tied with Croatia, Estonia and Poland. Nearly seven children die for every 1,000 live births in the United States. That was more than double the rate in Iceland, and 75 percent higher than rates in the Czech Republic, Finland, Japan and Slovenia.

Among developing countries, Egypt fared the best — lowering its child mortality rate by 68 percent largely by improving care for pregnant women, ensuring the presence of a skilled attendant during childbirth, and providing better family planning help.

Since 1994, Egypt has also increased health spending by more than 200 percent.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070508/ap_ ... on.6NX6GMA

Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 8:34 am
by guest
Thank you, USA. :x

Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 6:18 pm
by wewant2no2
The Population of Iraq in 2001 was:
23,331,985 (July 2001 est.)
Infant mortality rate was: 60.05 deaths/1,000 live births (2001 est.) 8O http://www.worldpress.org/profiles/Iraq.cfm

Iraq NOW has a population of 27,499,638 ( 2007 est.)
Infant mortality rate now is: 47.04 deaths/1,000 live births
https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/fa ... os/iz.html
Iraq's mortality rate has soared by 150 percent since 1990. Even before the latest war, Iraq was plagued by electricity shortages, a lack of clean water and too few hospitals.
Iraq's population in 1991 was 23,331,985 and in 2007 Iraq's population is 27,499,638 which is the difference of 4,168,653.... Iraq's population in 1990 was estimated at 17 million people. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Ir ... tnG=Search

There were more Infant mortality deaths in Iraq before 1991 than now. In 1991 it says Iraq had 60.05 deaths/1,000 live births, it's says now in 2007 47.04 deaths/1,000 live births... All I can say is do the math, the facts speak for themselves....

Take care.... :wink:

Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 6:28 pm
by detroithardcore
Thank you, USA. :x
You're welcome.

Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 7:29 pm
by guest
Hell, yeah, wewant2no2, let´s see what UNICEF says about that:
Infant mortality rate (under 1), 1990: 40
Infant mortality rate (under 1), 2005: 102

So let´s regard the statistics for children under 5:

Under-5 mortality rate, 1990: 50
Under-5 mortality rate, 2005: 125

So in 2005, 25 out of 200 children died before they reached the age of five.

In 1990, 10 out of 200 children died, before they reached the age of five.


Thank you, USA, for imposing sanctions on Iraq that did only hit the civilians and not Saddam.
Thank you, USA, for invading Iraq and make it one of the most, if not THE most dangerous place in the world, especially for children.
Thank you, USA.



And let us not forget the life expectancy:

Life expectancy, 1990: 63
Life expectancy, 2005: 60

@detroithardcore: Applausing to the death of small children. I wonder what your buddy weedbender would have said about that.....

Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 7:58 pm
by detroithardcore
Its America's fault the fanatics have ruined Iraq, phhhht.

Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 8:04 pm
by guest
Its America's fault the fanatics have ruined Iraq, phhhht.
Oh yeah, i forgot that it was AQ and similar organisations who imposed sanctions on Iraq after 1991.
And i forgot that it was them who invaded the country in 2003 in a war of aggression, and that they are the ones who are responsible for most civilian casualties since the invasion. Damn, how could i have forgotten that... stupid me, yeah.












:roll:

Seems you´re just the same type of person your country can be proud of like jayjay.

Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 10:38 pm
by wewant2no2
Thank you, USA, for imposing sanctions on Iraq that did only hit the civilians and not Saddam.
Thank you, USA, for invading Iraq and make it one of the most, if not THE most dangerous place in the world, especially for children.
Thank you, USA.
It was the UN... "United Nations" who imposed sanctions on Iraq not the USA. :roll: Why do you keep saying that? The permanent five are China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States. These members hold veto power. NOT ONE of the TOP 5 vetoed the sanctions on Iraq, and any of the top 5 members could have vetoded, BUT NONE DID!!! OK? Why do people here put the blame just on the USA for not vetoing the sanctions? ALL top 5 MEMBERS said "YES" "YES" "YES" "YES" "YES" to the Iraq sanctions? OK?

What's making it so dangerous for the innocents in Iraq right now is the terrorist Insurgent groups who are coming out of Iran, Syria, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan.... The reason, you can believe it or not, it doesn't really matter. But I got word that the top reason for the Insurgents killing all the Innocent Iraqis is because they voted for their freedom, and their new Governemt, when before they HAD to ONLY vote for SADDAM, or be imprisoned, or worse killed. The Terror Insurgent groups don't want democracy in the mid-east. So that is one reason they are killing the innocent people there. It's called genocide, and if the US pulls out it will get ten times worse. They will kill everyone who voted for their freedom, even the kids.

THE US and UK TROOPS ARE NOT THE ONES KILLING THE CIVILIANS. IT's the Terror groups. You can say all day long that if it were not for the US invading Iraq none of this would be happening. WELL there is where the rock meets the road. IT was happening before the US got there, it's been happening since Saddam when into power. Believe it or not.... I am sure you have read SADDAMS history, right? Like I said before it doesn't really matter to me if you believe it or not, seems a lot of people on this site just want to believe the worst of the worst and PUT ALL THE blame on the US..... :roll:

*************************

The Iraqis Are Victims of Saddam, Not of the Outside World
By Samuel R. Berger International Herald Tribune
Wednesday, October 20, 1999
http://www.iht.com/articles/1999/10/20/edberger.t.php

This backs UP most everything that was written by Samuel R. Berger in 99. AND it was written in 2001, before 9/11, before the war too! How about that!!

http://www.state.gov/p/nea/rls/01fs/3935.htm
Fact Sheet
Washington, DC
January 21, 2001

Myths and Facts About Iraq
Released by the Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs.


Fact: Iraq enjoyed a strong economy until Saddam Hussein took power and launched attacks against his neighbors--Iran in 1980 and Kuwait in 1990--with devastating results for Iraq. It took 5 years for Saddam to accept the oil-for-food program. Saddam also has failed to implement policies that would boost economic growth and generate job opportunities to improve the population's living standards. [/i]


IF ANYONE KILLED ALL THOSE KIDS, Saddam and his thugs did..... That a fact when you know what to read and not to read..... and a few people here know not what to read, because THEY pick out all the BS propaganda, because that's want they want to believe in.
Take care..
*****************************************

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 2:59 am
by yourmum
Thank you, USA, for imposing sanctions on Iraq that did only hit the civilians and not Saddam.
Thank you, USA, for invading Iraq and make it one of the most, if not THE most dangerous place in the world, especially for children.
Thank you, USA.
It was the UN... "United Nations" who imposed sanctions on Iraq not the USA. :roll: Why do you keep saying that? The permanent five are China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States. These members hold veto power. NOT ONE of the TOP 5 vetoed the sanctions on Iraq, and any of the top 5 members could have vetoded, BUT NONE DID!!! OK? Why do people here put the blame just on the USA for not vetoing the sanctions? ALL top 5 MEMBERS said "YES" "YES" "YES" "YES" "YES" to the Iraq sanctions? OK?

What's making it so dangerous for the innocents in Iraq right now is the terrorist Insurgent groups who are coming out of Iran, Syria, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan.... The reason, you can believe it or not, it doesn't really matter. But I got word that the top reason for the Insurgents killing all the Innocent Iraqis is because they voted for their freedom, and their new Governemt, when before they HAD to ONLY vote for SADDAM, or be imprisoned, or worse killed. The Terror Insurgent groups don't want democracy in the mid-east. So that is one reason they are killing the innocent people there. It's called genocide, and if the US pulls out it will get ten times worse. They will kill everyone who voted for their freedom, even the kids.

THE US and UK TROOPS ARE NOT THE ONES KILLING THE CIVILIANS. IT's the Terror groups. You can say all day long that if it were not for the US invading Iraq none of this would be happening. WELL there is where the rock meets the road. IT was happening before the US got there, it's been happening since Saddam when into power. Believe it or not.... I am sure you have read SADDAMS history, right? Like I said before it doesn't really matter to me if you believe it or not, seems a lot of people on this site just want to believe the worst of the worst and PUT ALL THE blame on the US..... :roll:

*************************

The Iraqis Are Victims of Saddam, Not of the Outside World
By Samuel R. Berger International Herald Tribune
Wednesday, October 20, 1999
http://www.iht.com/articles/1999/10/20/edberger.t.php

This backs UP most everything that was written by Samuel R. Berger in 99. AND it was written in 2001, before 9/11, before the war too! How about that!!

http://www.state.gov/p/nea/rls/01fs/3935.htm
Fact Sheet
Washington, DC
January 21, 2001

Myths and Facts About Iraq
Released by the Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs.


Fact: Iraq enjoyed a strong economy until Saddam Hussein took power and launched attacks against his neighbors--Iran in 1980 and Kuwait in 1990--with devastating results for Iraq. It took 5 years for Saddam to accept the oil-for-food program. Saddam also has failed to implement policies that would boost economic growth and generate job opportunities to improve the population's living standards. [/i]


IF ANYONE KILLED ALL THOSE KIDS, Saddam and his thugs did..... That a fact when you know what to read and not to read..... and a few people here know not what to read, because THEY pick out all the BS propaganda, because that's want they want to believe in.
Take care..
*****************************************
The US came up with the Idea at the UN.
The US enforced the no fly zones ect.
The US invaded in 03 for no reason.
The US invaded with not enough troops and with crap training insufficient to run a country.
The US let Iraqs munitions storages be ransacked and everything be stolen.
The US disbanded the Army and chose to build one from the ground up.
The US has wasted millions of Iraqs $$ paying private companies to do things they should have done who then do crappy jobs. Look into Iraqs hospitals for an example.
The US is still not willing to accept it is doing a crap job and doubling to troop numbers there liuke it will need to to defeat insurgents.

So basically its the US fault. While i agree the Insurgents kill as many innocents the only ppl to blame for the insurgents is the US because atleast saddam was tough enough to keep them out. Unlike the US who just keeps cruising along hoping a miracle will save them.

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 7:10 am
by guest
Thank you, USA, for imposing sanctions on Iraq that did only hit the civilians and not Saddam.
Thank you, USA, for invading Iraq and make it one of the most, if not THE most dangerous place in the world, especially for children.
Thank you, USA.
It was the UN... "United Nations" who imposed sanctions on Iraq not the USA. :roll: Why do you keep saying that?

Because the UN is a western-based, US/Israel-controlled system to support imperialism and capitalism? Why didn´t it impose sanctions on the US in 2003 when the US attacked Iraq in a war of aggression with a reason?

The permanent five are China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States. These members hold veto power. NOT ONE of the TOP 5 vetoed the sanctions on Iraq, and any of the top 5 members could have vetoded, BUT NONE DID!!! OK? Why do people here put the blame just on the USA for not vetoing the sanctions? ALL top 5 MEMBERS said "YES" "YES" "YES" "YES" "YES" to the Iraq sanctions? OK?

Hell yeah, i wonder why. Ever thought they there no members of the third world in the security council? Why France or the UK? Why not India? Or a country from Africa? Like i said above, that´s the reason.

What's making it so dangerous for the innocents in Iraq right now is the terrorist Insurgent groups who are coming out of Iran, Syria, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan....

Yep. All Iraqis are peaceful, but the Arabs from the neighbouring countries and the Persians are so evil. I wonder why the US did not invade any other country........

ok, let´s spare the sarcasm once: Do you really believe that the Iraqi insurgency is made up out "foreigners"? Really?


The reason, you can believe it or not, it doesn't really matter. But I got word that the top reason for the Insurgents killing all the Innocent Iraqis is because they voted for their freedom, and their new Governemt, when before they HAD to ONLY vote for SADDAM, or be imprisoned, or worse killed.

So the Insurgents are Baathists?

The Terror Insurgent groups don't want democracy in the mid-east.

That´s true. Like the USA. Or why do they support so many unhuman regimes in the ME?

So that is one reason they are killing the innocent people there. It's called genocide,

Errm .... no.

and if the US pulls out it will get ten times worse.

Yes. But it wouldn´t if they would have not invaded Iraq.

They will kill everyone who voted for their freedom, even the kids.

No. It will be shia<->sunnis.

THE US and UK TROOPS ARE NOT THE ONES KILLING THE CIVILIANS.

http://www.iraqbodycount.org/ ........

IT's the Terror groups.

Yes, US Army, US Marine Corps etc. Why do admit something that you rejected just in the sentence before?

You can say all day long that if it were not for the US invading Iraq none of this would be happening.

That´s right. So, whose fault is when Iraq is in turmoil?

WELL there is where the rock meets the road. IT was happening before the US got there, it's been happening since Saddam when into power.

Seems i have missed something ...... i didn´t know that there were carbombs, air raids and secterian death squads in Iraq before the USA invaded. But i think you can provide proof for your statement ..... from wiki, as always.....

Believe it or not.... I am sure you have read SADDAMS history, right?

No biography, but a chronological list of important dates.

Like I said before it doesn't really matter to me if you believe it or not, seems a lot of people on this site just want to believe the worst of the worst

There are some, probably

and PUT ALL THE blame on the US..... :roll:

This is another group. It´s called intelligent people.

*************************

The Iraqis Are Victims of Saddam, Not of the Outside World
By Samuel R. Berger International Herald Tribune
Wednesday, October 20, 1999
http://www.iht.com/articles/1999/10/20/edberger.t.php

This backs UP most everything that was written by Samuel R. Berger in 99. AND it was written in 2001, before 9/11, before the war too! How about that!!

http://www.state.gov/p/nea/rls/01fs/3935.htm
Fact Sheet
Washington, DC
January 21, 2001

Myths and Facts About Iraq
Released by the Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs.


Fact: Iraq enjoyed a strong economy until Saddam Hussein took power and launched attacks against his neighbors--Iran in 1980 and Kuwait in 1990--with devastating results for Iraq.


Damn, i wonder who gave MASSIVE support for the first war and remained silent when Saddam commited some of the worst crimes against humanity in the near past. And who gave the OK for the invasion of Kuweit......... You don´t know? Here´s a hint: It starts with "United States of" and ends with "America".


It took 5 years for Saddam to accept the oil-for-food program. Saddam also has failed to implement policies that would boost economic growth and generate job opportunities to improve the population's living standards.

Sadam was a brutal dictator, and everybody knew that. Still, he was supported in the 80s to do the dirty work. And after 1991, sanctions were imposed despite EVERYBODY knew that he wouldn´t care when his people, especially the shiites, suffer and die.


IF ANYONE KILLED ALL THOSE KIDS, Saddam and his thugs did.....

Yes. I you put a aggressive dog in a room with little cats, it´s him who kills the cats. Still, it´s your fault.

That a fact when you know what to read and not to read..... and a few people here know not what to read, because THEY pick out all the BS propaganda, because that's want they want to believe in.

Like you do. With your governmental BS.

Thanks yourmum.

Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 7:51 am
by yourmum
Where are you wewant2no??
You seem to always dissapear yet you claim to win every argument.

Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 9:27 am
by guest
Where are you wewant2no??
You seem to always dissapear yet you claim to win every argument.
It´s her usual behaviour. :wink: