Page 1 of 1

Osama Bin Laden’s son Omar Ossama is banned from Britain

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 5:42 am
by carbomb
Osama Bin Laden’s son Omar Ossama is banned from Britain
Image :1 of 2

David Brown
The son of Osama bin Laden has been banned from entering Britain to live with his new wife because of fears that his presence would cause “considerable public concern”.

Officials have told Omar Ossama bin Laden that there is evidence that he is still loyal to his father, who is held responsible for the deaths of 52 innocent people in the London bombings of July 7, 2005.

Mr bin Laden, 27, is appealing against the refusal to grant him a visa and says that it is wrong to ban him from Britain on the basis of his parentage and inaccurate media reports about his beliefs.

He wants to live in Cheshire with his British wife, Zaina Alsabah bin Laden, 52, formerly known as Jane Felix-Browne. The couple were married in Saudi Arabia last year after a holiday romance but have been living in Egypt while waiting for Mr bin Laden’s visa application to be processed.

His application was refused by an entry clearance officer at the British Embassy in Cairo. The embassy said that the decision had been made on the ground that “exclusion from the United Kingdom is conducive to the public good . . . in the light of the character, conduct or association of the person seeking leave to enter it is undesirable to give him leave to enter”.

The officer added: “I note that statements made during recent media interviews indicate evidence of continuing loyalty to your father, and your presence in the UK could, therefore, cause considerable public concern.”

Mr and Mrs bin Laden have lodged an appeal to be heard by an immigration judge, claiming that the decision is “unjust and arbitrary”. They say there is no evidence that his presence in Britain would be a security risk.

Mr bin Laden left Saudi Arabia as a child when his father was expelled for his extremist beliefs and the family lived in exile in Sudan and then Afghanistan. He said that he left his father before the attacks on the US in September 11, 2001, and returned to Saudi Arabia, were he worked as a metals trader. The couple met in Egypt in September 2006. After their marriage Mr bin Laden divorced his first bride; his new wife’s application to live with him in Saudi Arabia is still being processed.

Mrs bin Laden, 52, who has been married six times and has three sons and five grandchildren, said: “In September last year Omar left Saudi Arabia for good because we couldn’t live apart any more – it was breaking our hearts. It could take the Saudi government years to wade through all their applications before they get to ours.

“We have a nice house in Cairo, but we have no real place to call home. I need my family and I need medical attention in the UK. Our only chance to be together was to live in Britain. We have vowed never to be parted. Omar will never take another wife as long as I am alive.”

Her husband applied for a married settlement visa in October last year. He was granted a visa to visit Italy in February and this month was granted a Schengen visa to travel freely within Europe. The couple have recently visited Austria, Belgium and France without any trouble.

Since being thrust into the public spotlight after becoming the first of bin Laden’s children to marry a Westerner, Mr bin Laden has repeatedly condemned the attacks on America and London. He said he could not condemn his father because he had no evidence of his involvement in terrorism.

Mr bin Laden said: “Who can know 100 per cent that my father is behind 9/11 or 7/7? I am not a judge and jury. I do not know if my father is a terrorist or was involved in the attacks.

“I want to come to England with my wife so she can be close to her children and grandchildren and she should also be near her hospital. The English are nice people and I am sure they will welcome me. People will understand I am not my father. I want to stop war, stop bombing and stop the killing.”

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/u ... 842353.ece

Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 9:24 pm
by DenichMsk
Officials have told Omar Ossama bin Laden that there is evidence that he is still loyal to his father, who is held responsible for the deaths of 52 innocent people in the London bombings of July 7, 2005.
What do you think, carbomb?

Are they (britains) right in this question for banning him or not?

P.S.: I don't think that Omar Bin Laden will be banned in Russia because he will be killed in next day by "skinheads" or "car thiefs" somewhere in center of Moscow... (I just imagine this situation/scenario)

Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 1:06 am
by seymore
I don't think he would be killed in Russia (unless he walks into the wrong alleyway or the wrong part of town - but that is true just about everywhere in the world).

His views are contrary to his father and he disagrees with most if not all of Usama's viewpoints.

Britian is slowly becoming a police state - there is no question about this. The banning of this particular person is mainly symbolic on the part of the crusading British authorities.

Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 8:22 am
by carbomb
DenichMsk wrote:
Officials have told Omar Ossama bin Laden that there is evidence that he is still loyal to his father, who is held responsible for the deaths of 52 innocent people in the London bombings of July 7, 2005.
What do you think, carbomb?

Are they (britains) right in this question for banning him or not?

P.S.: I don't think that Omar Bin Laden will be banned in Russia because he will be killed in next day by "skinheads" or "car thiefs" somewhere in center of Moscow... (I just imagine this situation/scenario)
I think they are once again making a mistake. Altough Omar bin Laden is against violence, I think he does agree with the grievances and injustice the muslims are suffering too.
The British goverment and most of the european goverment, don't like to admit that for example Israel is commiting war crimes and occupying land.
They just like to have so called muslims of The Quilliam Foundation, who advocate western values and complete submission to the British nation.

It's rather foolish stick to the opinion that the Middle East is totally doing great and that terrorists are people who attack us, because they don't like our freedom and our way of life.

But in general I am pleased with the reaction of the British goverment, they again showed they are totally not interested in a constructive dialog, which I don't support anyways. They have killed to much muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan for that. And even their past is full of muslim blood.
It's best to send their soldiers home in bodybags while at the same time having hero's like Mohammed Sidique Khan's, bringing the war to their homefront.



About Moscow, what do you mean :D ? I was planning to visit there in the vacation :lol: .
Seriously why would he even go to Moscow?
Get a batch of polonium-210.

And it's rather strange to see all those skinheads running around, hitting poor immigrants, without the security forces interfering. To be honest it really disappoints me that you talk about them in some kind of proud or humerous way. Just hope one day one of those immigrants pulls a shotgun when he sees them rushing towards him, and blast their heads off.

Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 10:34 am
by DenichMsk
carbomb wrote: I think they are once again making a mistake. Altough Omar bin Laden is against violence
I agreed. But he is son of Bin Laden... He is a person who will be always reminds a some hatefull speeches of his father like "In Saudia Arabia modern politics are a grandsons of Abu Rigul who don't know a meaning of Prophet's life witch are full of greatest clashes against crusaders and jews"... (You remember the speeches of UBL in the 1st part of "States of Ummah")

I think Osama Bin Laden is right. All life Prophet Muhhamad fights against jews and some religious groups inside Saudi Arabia.... But today times are changed. Globalism is coming :lol:

Bin Laden is enemy #1 for non-muslims and his son said that he love him and don't want to call him a "terrorist". This opinion gives some "right" (sic!) for british ultra nationalists to kill him as symbol.

Seems some British police officers don't want to see him dead inside their country. I understand them.
Seriously why would he even go to Moscow?
This is just my scenario. What will be happens if...

about skinheads and assasination.
We have a lot of stupid nationalists who are not under goverment control. And FSB/Army/Militia are full of such bloody thugs...
Politkovskaya are a good example. She was killed in bithday of Putin not by his order. She was killed by some nationalists from militia who are just hate her works about chechnya and army.
I was planning to visit there in the vacation
Hopefully you will visit Moscow in 9 may. You will see in Red Square a lot of soldiers and military technics in our military march. All these guys will attack Georgia at soon. (You know that russian politics want to see Abkhasia and Osetia in part of Russia not Georgia).

It's stupid imperialist idea but every our NEW president want to see a new war. It's tradition. :wink:

You're welcome :D