Page 1 of 2
Time names Bush 2004 ‘Person of the Year’
Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 12:18 am
by Chaos
I'm speechless.
Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 5:35 am
by USCAVSCOUT
I would name Colin Powell person of the year not Bush.
Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 3:45 pm
by jpstr00
I'd have to go with the US Armed Forces...
Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 7:21 pm
by Comunista_Guatemala
uscavscout pffff army wannabe
Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 10:58 pm
by Chaos
You know, the pair of you are something.
Before I tell you what complete broadbrushing twats you are being, would you please tell me whether or not when you say "Americans", you are speaking of the military or Americans in general? Thank you.
Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 11:35 pm
by Chaos
Thank you for clarifying that. I've overlooked your explanations, clearly. I admit to mainly only reading samplings of your more recent missives since my joining. Perhaps making that distinction in every post would be asking too much, but would cut down on confusion for us "Privates."
Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 11:47 pm
by Chaos
Fair enough.
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 10:48 pm
by Chaos
deeuk wrote:Love him or hate him, there's no doubt about the influence he has had in the world over the past few years. Time magazine made the appropriate choice
According to their website, Time has the following criteria:
TIME's choices for Person of the Year are often controversial. Editors are asked to choose the person or thing that had the greatest impact on the news, for good or ill—guidelines that leave them no choice but to select a newsworthy—not necessarily praiseworthy—cover subject.
Might have just as easily been Brittany Spears. Bet she's heartbroken.