Cryptome receives shutdown notice by its service provider

Anynews unrelated to Terrorism

Moderators: Cell_Leader, ikaotiki, Julstar

Post Reply
User avatar
martino
Specialist, Fifth Class [E-5]
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 5:00 am
Location: Paris, France
Contact:

Cryptome receives shutdown notice by its service provider

Post by martino »

John Young, the administrator of "Cryptome", a fine website on all matters that involve intelligence and encryption, has recently received a shutdown notice from its service provider:

http://cryptome.org/cryptome-shut.htm

Dear Mr. Young,

This letter is to notify you that we are terminating your service for violation of our Acceptable Use Policy, effective Friday May 4, 2007. We are providing you with two week notice to locate another service provider.

Sincerely,

VERIO INC.
an NTT Communications Company

[Signed]

Danna Thompson
Legal Department

Verio Inc.
8005 S. Chester Street
Suite 200
Englewood, CO 80112
www.verio.com

____________________________

Cryptome:

This notice of termination is surprising for Verio has been consistently supportive of freedom of information against those who wish to suppress it. Since 1999 Cryptome has received a number of e-mailed notices from Verio's legal department in response to complaints from a variety of parties, ranging from British intelligence to snarly DMCA thugs to perps angry that their vices have been exposed (see below). In every case Verio has heretofore accepted Cryptome's explanation for publishing material, and in some cases removal of the material, and service has continued.

In this latest instance there was no notice received from Verio describing the violation of acceptable use to justify termination of service prior to receipt of the certified letter, thus no opportunity to understand or respond to the basis for termination.

It may be wondered if Verio was threatened by an undisclosable means, say by the feds, cops, spooks, by a confidential legal bluff or by an abusive intimidation not yet publicized.
Post Reply